UMICH-2015: Instrumentation I break-out session 2

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Wiki navigation

Return to main workshop page

Return to Instrumentation I sessions page


Goals: Analyze technology status and progress needed to read out direct detectors on the scale of CMB-S4. Please note that direct coherent amplification of CMB signals (with HEMT or other amplifiers) is covered in the detector session.

  1. Identify requirements for CMB-S4 polarimeter readout electronics, including both cryogenic and room-temperature components
  2. Review status of existing technologies with particular attention to assessing feasibility for scaling to the total pixel count of CMB-S4 (order of 500,000 total across multiple platforms) and cost
  3. Identify work that needs to be done in order to complete maturation of candidate technologies.

Please come prepared to describe readout techniques for CMB detectors as described above. If you have a slide to add, please post it on the wiki. If you think of additional questions or topics for debate, please add those as well.

Top-level requirements for discussion


  • O($100 / pixel) is too much
  • O($10 / pixel) is about right
  • O($1 / pixel) may not be worth the R&D cost

Noise lower than the sensor

Cryogenic components scalable to O[500,000] sensors

  • Physical size of filter and readout components
  • Power dissipation per pixel
  • Focal-plane interconnects
Can wirebonds from each pixel out of the focal plane work for CMB-S4?
Bump-bond hybridization?
On-wafer multiplexing elements? (LC resonators coupled to TESs or MKIDs)
  • Number of wires to 4K
  • Number of wires to 300K

Acceptable crosstalk

  • Nearest neighbor
  • Distant pixel

Room-temperature electronics scalability

The path forward

Statement: we have two mature readout techniques: TDM and FDM.

  • Is the fabrication scalable in both of these techniques?
  • Can the cost be scaled?
  • Can the wiring be scaled?

Statement: we have 4 next-generation readout techniques at different levels of maturity: Microwave SQUIDs, KPUPs, Microwave resonator TESs, MKIDs

  • These techniques have advantages in scaling and cost
  • How much do we want to push to next generation techniques for CMB-S4?


CMB Polarimeter cryogenic multiplexer technology

  1. Time-division multiplexing for TES Bolometers
  2. Frequency-division multiplexing for ac-biased TES Bolometers
  3. Microwave-resonator multiplexing for dc-biased TES Bolometers: microwave SQUIDs, KPUPs, or direct readout with quantum-limited amplifiers
  4. Microwave-resonator readout of MKIDs

Room-temperature electronics

  1. UBC MCE for TDM
  2. McGill digital feedback electronics for FDM
  3. ROACH2 for resonator TES, microwave SQUID, or MKID
  4. SLAC LCLS boards for resonator TES, microwave SQUID, or MKID
  5. GPU

Advantages/disadvantages, comparison of readout options

  1. Technological maturity
  2. Fabrication complexity, yield, uniformity
  3. Scalability to order [500,000] detectors
  4. Cost

Required Work or Studies

  1. What is technological readiness?
  2. What are the technical tradeoffs?
  3. What are unknowns?
  4. What is timeline for development?

Slides for Discussion

MUX overview: [[Media:ReadoutOverview.pdf]]

Time division SQUID multiplexing (Hannes Hubmayr): Media:Hubmayr_cmbs4_tdm.pdf

Adrian Lee: FDM [[Media:2015.09.22.Adrian.Lee.FDM.small.pdf]]

Microwave SQUID multiplexing (Hannes Hubmayr): Media:Hubmayr_cmbs4_umux.pdf

Ed Wollack: Superconducting bump-bond hybridization [[Media:CMBS42014Wollack_Superconducting_Interconnects.pdf]]

Peter Day: KPUPs [[Media:Day_-_KPUP_-_0815.pdf]]