Difference between revisions of "UMICH-2015: Inflation break-out session 1"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| − | + | !!Foregrounds!! | |
*What are our latest estimates of foreground levels post-Planck? | *What are our latest estimates of foreground levels post-Planck? | ||
*What simulations and tools do we have for forecasting impact on r? | *What simulations and tools do we have for forecasting impact on r? | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*How important is large sky area? | *How important is large sky area? | ||
| − | + | !!Delensing!! | |
*What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt? | *What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt? | ||
*How does internal CMB delensing compare to external (e.g. CIB)? | *How does internal CMB delensing compare to external (e.g. CIB)? | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
(This is the space to add your name and upload figures) | (This is the space to add your name and upload figures) | ||
| − | + | !!Foregrounds!! | |
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*What simulations and tools do we have for forecasting impact on r? (Jacques, Raphael, Stephen F, Aurelien, Jo) | *What simulations and tools do we have for forecasting impact on r? (Jacques, Raphael, Stephen F, Aurelien, Jo) | ||
| − | *What are still physical unknowns? | + | |
| + | ----- | ||
| + | *What are still physical unknowns? (Al Kogut?) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Magnetic dust, spinning dust polarization, spatial dispersion of dust temperature/emissivity | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
*Do we need new data at <40 GHz and >230 GHz? (Jo) | *Do we need new data at <40 GHz and >230 GHz? (Jo) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
*How important is large sky area? | *How important is large sky area? | ||
| − | + | ----- | |
| + | |||
| + | !!Delensing!! (Blake Sherwin, Olivier Dore, Chris Sheehy, Josquin Errard, Stephen Feeney) | ||
| + | ----- | ||
*What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt? | *What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
*How does internal CMB delensing compare to external (e.g. CIB)? | *How does internal CMB delensing compare to external (e.g. CIB)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Blake says external cleaning won't be good enough for 1 uK noise levels. | ||
| + | ----- | ||
*What sensitivity and resolution do we need for the lensing map? | *What sensitivity and resolution do we need for the lensing map? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 17 September 2015
B-modes challenges: foregrounds and de-lensing
Return to Inflation sessions page
!!Foregrounds!!
- What are our latest estimates of foreground levels post-Planck?
- What simulations and tools do we have for forecasting impact on r?
- What are still physical unknowns?
- Do we need new data at <40 GHz and >230 GHz?
- How important is large sky area?
!!Delensing!!
- What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt?
- How does internal CMB delensing compare to external (e.g. CIB)?
- How important is it to have lensing map from the same instrument?
- What sensitivity and resolution do we need for the lensing map?
(This is the space to add your name and upload figures)
!!Foregrounds!!
- What are our latest estimates of foreground levels post-Planck? (Steve, Raphael...)
Can we make a new version of this figure:
- What simulations and tools do we have for forecasting impact on r? (Jacques, Raphael, Stephen F, Aurelien, Jo)
- What are still physical unknowns? (Al Kogut?)
Magnetic dust, spinning dust polarization, spatial dispersion of dust temperature/emissivity
- Do we need new data at <40 GHz and >230 GHz? (Jo)
- How important is large sky area?
!!Delensing!! (Blake Sherwin, Olivier Dore, Chris Sheehy, Josquin Errard, Stephen Feeney)
- What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt?
- How does internal CMB delensing compare to external (e.g. CIB)?
Blake says external cleaning won't be good enough for 1 uK noise levels.
- What sensitivity and resolution do we need for the lensing map?
