Difference between revisions of "UMICH-2015:ChallengeDelensing"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
[[File:blakeDelens.png|400px]][[File:deLensNoise.png|400px]]
 
[[File:blakeDelens.png|400px]][[File:deLensNoise.png|400px]]
  
*Improvement from external delensing (e.g. CIB) isn't good enough:
+
*'''Blake''':Improvement from external delensing (e.g. CIB) isn't good enough:
  
 
[[File:deLensingExt.png|500px]]
 
[[File:deLensingExt.png|500px]]
  
High resolution is good:
+
*'''Blake:''' High resolution is good:
  
 
[[File:deLensingRes.png|500px]]
 
[[File:deLensingRes.png|500px]]

Revision as of 09:46, 20 September 2015

Return to break-out session page

Delensing

Blake Sherwin, Olivier Dore, Chris Sheehy, Josquin Errard, Stephen Feeney, Alex van Engelen, Neelima Sehgal, Hiranya Peiris, Anthony Challinor...

What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt or BB wiggles?

  • Anthony C - let's think about trying to measure the B-mode spectrum shape
  • Stephen Feeney: some forecasts of S4 performance on r:

DeLensing feeney1.png

500px


What sensitivity and resolution do we need for the lensing map?

  • Blake: need high sensitivity lensing map.Plot shows residual delensed B-mode noise on large scales vs. noise of the high-res lens-reconstruction-experiment.

BlakeDelens.pngDeLensNoise.png

  • Blake:Improvement from external delensing (e.g. CIB) isn't good enough:

DeLensingExt.png

  • Blake: High resolution is good:

DeLensingRes.png