Difference between revisions of "UMICH-2015:ChallengeDelensing"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*'''Blake''': need high sensitivity lensing map.Plot shows residual delensed B-mode noise on large scales vs. noise of the high-res lens-reconstruction-experiment. | *'''Blake''': need high sensitivity lensing map.Plot shows residual delensed B-mode noise on large scales vs. noise of the high-res lens-reconstruction-experiment. | ||
| − | [[File:deLensing.png|500px]] | + | [[File:deLensing.png|500px]][[File:deLensNoise.png|500px]] |
Improvement from external delensing isn't good enough: | Improvement from external delensing isn't good enough: | ||
Revision as of 09:41, 20 September 2015
Return to break-out session page
Delensing
Blake Sherwin, Olivier Dore, Chris Sheehy, Josquin Errard, Stephen Feeney, Alex van Engelen, Neelima Sehgal, Hiranya Peiris, Anthony Challinor...
What is the impact of delensing on r, and on nt or BB wiggles?
- Anthony C - let's think about trying to measure the B-mode spectrum shape
- Stephen Feeney: some forecasts of S4 performance on r:
What sensitivity and resolution do we need for the lensing map?
- Is external lensing map good enough (e.g. CIB?) - No!
- Blake: need high sensitivity lensing map.Plot shows residual delensed B-mode noise on large scales vs. noise of the high-res lens-reconstruction-experiment.
Improvement from external delensing isn't good enough:
High resolution is good:
