Difference between revisions of "UCSD-2019: Technical Working Group: Readout"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Charge) |
(→Charge) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#Lay out a timeline and process for making each decision, consistent with the post-decision work and internal reviews that will be needed to complete preparations for CD-1, | #Lay out a timeline and process for making each decision, consistent with the post-decision work and internal reviews that will be needed to complete preparations for CD-1, | ||
#Ensure that those timelines and processes are understood and supported by the collaboration, and that we (together) believe we can follow them. | #Ensure that those timelines and processes are understood and supported by the collaboration, and that we (together) believe we can follow them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | CD-1 Driver for Readout: Conceptual Design <br> | ||
| + | Major Decisions: TDM vs FDM vs uMux | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 11 October 2019
Contents
Charge
We need to use the October collaboration meeting to advance our preparations for CD-1. We need to:
- Identify key decisions that must be made (and justified) prior to CD-1,
- Make progress on (or actually make) those decisions,
- Lay out a timeline and process for making each decision, consistent with the post-decision work and internal reviews that will be needed to complete preparations for CD-1,
- Ensure that those timelines and processes are understood and supported by the collaboration, and that we (together) believe we can follow them.
CD-1 Driver for Readout: Conceptual Design
Major Decisions: TDM vs FDM vs uMux
Agenda
Template Slides With Questions Charged to Each Group: [1]
- Technology 1 presentation (20 min)
- Technology 2 presentation (20 min)
- Technology 2 presentation (20 min)
- Discussion (30 min)
- Moving towards down-select: Timeline & Process (15 min, L2s)
- Discussion (15 min)
