Difference between revisions of "UCSD-2019: Cross-Cut: Simulations for Measurement Requirements"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
[https://hackmd.io/o1KtRAHXSliAP-sfL73r8A Collaborative note taking on hackMD]
 
[https://hackmd.io/o1KtRAHXSliAP-sfL73r8A Collaborative note taking on hackMD]
 +
 +
= Cross-Cut: Simulations for Measurement Requirements =
 +
 +
[https://cmb-s4.org/wiki/index.php/UCSD-2019:_Cross-Cut:_Simulations_for_Measurement_Requirements Link to wiki]
 +
 +
== Agenda and notes ==
 +
 +
* 5 min - Andrea Zonca: PySM 3, simulation tools developed for Simons Observatory
 +
* 5 min - Marcelo Alvarez: Extragalactic modeling integration in PySM 3, Simulations requirements for cluster finding
 +
* 5 min - Reijo Keskitalo: Scanning strategy for S4
 +
* 5 min - Ben Racine: Noise simulations for PGW analysis
 +
* 25 min - Discussion:
 +
 +
=== Unified sky model ===
 +
 +
==== Galactic ====
 +
 +
* PySM (<code>so_pysm_models</code>) NSIDE 8192 Planck + Gaussian
 +
* MHD: Dust + Synch small patches
 +
* d7 - implement in PySM 3 and increase resolution
 +
* Currently used model up until DSR by the r-forecasting group: ** 00 - Simple Gaussian Sync/Dust with uniform amplitude across the sky ** 01 - PySM base (@zonca has higher nside than 512, to 4096? will get to 8192) ** 02 - PySM extended (@zonca has higher nside than 512, to 4096? will get to 8192) ** 03 - Same as 02 but Hensley/Draine dust model ** 04 - HiDPol dust model (by Tuhin Ghosh) ** 05 - Strong decorrelation model ** 06 - MHD based model from Flauger/Hensley (should swap in &quot;08&quot;: one with more correct synchrotron) ** 07 - Amplitude modulated Gaussian ** 08 - MKD multilayer model from arxiv/1706.04162 ** 09 - Vansyngel model as described in arxiv/1611.02577 with multi-frequency extension
 +
* For delensing, we need small scale polarized non-Gaussian Galactic foregrounds. Currently, only 09 has small scale NG.
 +
* discuss: 00 should be replaced with 07? 00 won't be meaningfully used by the large area survey. But it is useful for the deep survey for sanity checks.
 +
* To generalize 08 and 09 into PySM, @zonca has to ask the creator of these models for code/info.
 +
* Q: are there other Galactic models used in S4 outside of the r-forecasting group?
 +
* Check consistency with Planck
 +
* CO lines?
 +
 +
=== How to gather requirements from AWG ===
 +
 +
=== Extragalactic + Clusters ===
 +
 +
* Websky, 1 realization
 +
* validated against planck
 +
* lensing: 1 realization
 +
* radio galaxy sources, catalog input, PySM component could generate map on the fly
 +
* tSZ from Planck, CIB from Herschel and Planck, dusty galaxy count compared to Herschel, stack clusters
 +
 +
=== Noise ===
 +
 +
==== Scanning strategy ====
 +
 +
* https://cmb-s4.org/wiki/index.php/Deeper_SAT_from_Chile_II
 +
* https://cmb-s4.org/wiki/index.php/High_cadence_LAT_from_Chile
 +
 +
High cadence LAT gives lot of f_sky and daily scans for transients
 +
 +
* https://cmb-s4.org/wiki/index.php/Deep_SAT_from_the_Pole
 +
 +
Below only done in case of r detection from Deep SAT:
 +
 +
* https://cmb-s4.org/wiki/index.php/Wider_SAT_from_the_Pole_II
 +
 +
Jan &amp; Feb we could remove
 +
 +
Clem has already noise pipeline
 +
 +
Delensing LAT from Pole??
 +
 +
==== Noise simulations for PWG ====
 +
 +
* SAT BK start from data, fit noise model, just scaling NET, Pole
 +
* BK noise calculator does not agree with data
 +
* Noise calculator is just used for LAT
 +
* Extrapolating 220 to 270, same below
 +
* Check POLARBEAR new released performance, use that to scale?
 +
 +
Delensing '''LAT''' at Pole needs a noise model, maybe scaling SPT??

Revision as of 13:58, 19 October 2019

Link back to agenda

Charge

  • How do we coordinate the production of a unified sky model with enough realism and flexibility for the AWGs?
  • What simulations do we need for clusters and what cross-checks will be available with data?

Agenda

Please add your name below the agenda if you plan to participate in the session, contact User:Zonca

  • 5 min - Andrea Zonca: PySM 3, simulation tools developed for Simons Observatory
  • 5 min - Marcelo Alvarez: Extragalactic modeling integration in PySM 3, Simulations requirements for cluster finding File:Exgal sims.pdf
  • 5 min - Reijo Keskitalo: Scanning strategy for S4 Chile deep Chile wide Pole deep Pole wide
  • 5 min - Ben Racine: Noise simulations for PGW analysis Sims for PGW
  • 30 min - Discussion:
    • Unified sky model
    • How to gather requirements from AWG
    • Clusters
    • Plans for map-based simulations

Other participants: Raphael Flauger, Kimmy Wu

Remote attendance

Zoom link

Notes

Collaborative note taking on hackMD

Cross-Cut: Simulations for Measurement Requirements

Link to wiki

Agenda and notes

  • 5 min - Andrea Zonca: PySM 3, simulation tools developed for Simons Observatory
  • 5 min - Marcelo Alvarez: Extragalactic modeling integration in PySM 3, Simulations requirements for cluster finding
  • 5 min - Reijo Keskitalo: Scanning strategy for S4
  • 5 min - Ben Racine: Noise simulations for PGW analysis
  • 25 min - Discussion:

Unified sky model

Galactic

  • PySM (so_pysm_models) NSIDE 8192 Planck + Gaussian
  • MHD: Dust + Synch small patches
  • d7 - implement in PySM 3 and increase resolution
  • Currently used model up until DSR by the r-forecasting group: ** 00 - Simple Gaussian Sync/Dust with uniform amplitude across the sky ** 01 - PySM base (@zonca has higher nside than 512, to 4096? will get to 8192) ** 02 - PySM extended (@zonca has higher nside than 512, to 4096? will get to 8192) ** 03 - Same as 02 but Hensley/Draine dust model ** 04 - HiDPol dust model (by Tuhin Ghosh) ** 05 - Strong decorrelation model ** 06 - MHD based model from Flauger/Hensley (should swap in "08": one with more correct synchrotron) ** 07 - Amplitude modulated Gaussian ** 08 - MKD multilayer model from arxiv/1706.04162 ** 09 - Vansyngel model as described in arxiv/1611.02577 with multi-frequency extension
  • For delensing, we need small scale polarized non-Gaussian Galactic foregrounds. Currently, only 09 has small scale NG.
  • discuss: 00 should be replaced with 07? 00 won't be meaningfully used by the large area survey. But it is useful for the deep survey for sanity checks.
  • To generalize 08 and 09 into PySM, @zonca has to ask the creator of these models for code/info.
  • Q: are there other Galactic models used in S4 outside of the r-forecasting group?
  • Check consistency with Planck
  • CO lines?

How to gather requirements from AWG

Extragalactic + Clusters

  • Websky, 1 realization
  • validated against planck
  • lensing: 1 realization
  • radio galaxy sources, catalog input, PySM component could generate map on the fly
  • tSZ from Planck, CIB from Herschel and Planck, dusty galaxy count compared to Herschel, stack clusters

Noise

Scanning strategy

High cadence LAT gives lot of f_sky and daily scans for transients

Below only done in case of r detection from Deep SAT:

Jan & Feb we could remove

Clem has already noise pipeline

Delensing LAT from Pole??

Noise simulations for PWG

  • SAT BK start from data, fit noise model, just scaling NET, Pole
  • BK noise calculator does not agree with data
  • Noise calculator is just used for LAT
  • Extrapolating 220 to 270, same below
  • Check POLARBEAR new released performance, use that to scale?

Delensing LAT at Pole needs a noise model, maybe scaling SPT??

Retrieved from "https://cmb-s4.uchicago.edu/wiki/index.php?title=UCSD-2019:_Cross-Cut:_Simulations_for_Measurement_Requirements&oldid=10215"