Difference between revisions of "UCSD-2019: Cross-Cut: Delensing"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Charge) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Charge == | == Charge == | ||
| + | General charge to all parallels: | ||
| + | We need to use the October collaboration meeting to advance our preparations for CD-1. Right away, we need to: | ||
| + | * Identify key decisions that must be made (and justified) prior to CD-1, | ||
| + | * Make progress on (or actually make) those decisions, | ||
| + | * Lay out a timeline and process for making each decision, consistent with the post-decision work and internal reviews that will be needed to complete preparations for CD-1, | ||
| + | * Ensure that those timelines and processes are understood and supported by the collaboration, and that we (together) believe we can follow them. | ||
| + | Specific charge to this '''delensing cross-cut session''': | ||
| + | * For the de-lensing LAT, what are the benefits and costs of variation in angular resolution (dish size) for legacy survey science goals? | ||
| + | * What is minimum dish size / throughput needed for delensing? Would multiple smaller telescopes be better than one bigger one? (both r + Neff) | ||
| + | * What are the effects of foregrounds on delensing (both for r and Neff) | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
Revision as of 18:32, 12 October 2019
Charge
General charge to all parallels:
We need to use the October collaboration meeting to advance our preparations for CD-1. Right away, we need to:
- Identify key decisions that must be made (and justified) prior to CD-1,
- Make progress on (or actually make) those decisions,
- Lay out a timeline and process for making each decision, consistent with the post-decision work and internal reviews that will be needed to complete preparations for CD-1,
- Ensure that those timelines and processes are understood and supported by the collaboration, and that we (together) believe we can follow them.
Specific charge to this delensing cross-cut session:
- For the de-lensing LAT, what are the benefits and costs of variation in angular resolution (dish size) for legacy survey science goals?
- What is minimum dish size / throughput needed for delensing? Would multiple smaller telescopes be better than one bigger one? (both r + Neff)
- What are the effects of foregrounds on delensing (both for r and Neff)
Agenda
== Remote Attendance
