Difference between revisions of "Simulations for configurations with different frequency coverage"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 167: Line 167:
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_30.png|600 px]]
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_30.png|600 px]]
  
==== Noise realizations ====
 
  
Noise realization 0001
 
 
[[File:30.0001.png|800 px]]
 
 
Noise realization 0002
 
 
[[File:30.0002.png|800 px]]
 
  
 
=== Configuration 31 ===
 
=== Configuration 31 ===
Line 187: Line 179:
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_31.png|600 px]]
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_31.png|600 px]]
  
Noise realization 0001
 
  
[[File:31.0001.png|800 px]]
 
 
Noise realization 0002
 
 
[[File:31.0002.png|800 px]]
 
  
 
=== Configuration 32 ===
 
=== Configuration 32 ===
Line 205: Line 191:
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_32.png|600 px]]
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_32.png|600 px]]
  
==== Noise realizations ====
 
  
Noise realization 0001
 
 
[[File:32.0001.png|800 px]]
 
 
Noise realization 0002
 
 
[[File:32.0002.png|800 px]]
 
  
 
=== Configuration 33 ===
 
=== Configuration 33 ===
Line 225: Line 203:
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_33.png|600 px]]
 
[[File:l2sigmaNl_33.png|600 px]]
  
==== Noise realizations ====
 
  
Noise realization 0001
+
 
 +
== Sample noise realizations ==
 +
 
 +
=== Configuration 30 ===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0001 ====
 +
 
 +
[[File:30.0001.png|800 px]]
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0002 ====
 +
 
 +
[[File:30.0002.png|800 px]]
 +
 
 +
=== Configuration 31 ===
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0001 ====
 +
 
 +
[[File:31.0001.png|800 px]]
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0002 ====
 +
 
 +
[[File:31.0002.png|800 px]]
 +
 
 +
=== Configuration 32 ===
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0001 ====
 +
 
 +
[[File:32.0001.png|800 px]]
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0002 ====
 +
 
 +
[[File:32.0002.png|800 px]]
 +
 
 +
=== Configuration 33 ===
 +
 
 +
==== Noise realization 0001 ====
  
 
[[File:33.0001.png|800 px]]
 
[[File:33.0001.png|800 px]]
  
Noise realization 0002
+
==== Noise realization 0002 ====
  
 
[[File:33.0002.png|800 px]]
 
[[File:33.0002.png|800 px]]

Revision as of 15:06, 30 March 2019

Summary

This posting describes simulations for four different configurations with 12 optics tubes but different frequency coverage. The configurations range from a charicature with 4 bands to the configuration with 9 bands that has been studied most extensively.

The counting of frequency bands includes the high resolution low frequency band on the delensing LAT. For this band the parameters are taken from the SAT survey 05 described in the posting Survey_Performance_Expectations, which differs somewhat from the parameters for the large area survey described in the same posting.

The bandwidth for all channels is as before and has been omitted from the table.

500 simulations for each configuration with r=0 are available in the data_xx.yy folder at NERSC. All simulations are for the circular hits map used in previous studies. The simulations are based on the lensed and unlensed Planck FFP10 CMB realizations available at NERSC. The residual lensing amplitude is set to AL=0.082, which is based on the delensing forecasts for 7 years of observations with the delensing LAT for this circular mask. The foreground models considered are the PySM model a2f1d7s3 (model 03) and the first model based on MHD simulations (model 06). They are taken from the sky_yy folder at NERSC.

The configuration numbers below (30-33) are chosen to clearly distinguish them from the main data challenge simulations (01-04). The sensitivities are obtained by rescaling the sensitivities for configuration 05 "S4 Pole — 7 years with 12 tubes of Config 5" described in the posting Survey_Performance_Expectations using the numbers of detectors and resolutions given in this spreadsheet. Noise maps for the associated noise spectrum are generated using synfast, then reweighted by the hits map and rescaled to achieve the desired normalization. The maps are filtered to remove large scale information.

Configurations

Configuration 30

This configuration relies on monochromatic detectors labeled option 3 in the spreadsheet. It consists of 2 optics tubes with 30 GHz detectors, 8 optics tubes with 95 GHz detectors, and 2 optics tubes with 270 GHz detectors.


Frequency (GHz) 20 30 95 270
Beam FWHM (arcmin) 11.0 72.8 22.7 8.0
white noise level TT (uK-arcmin) 16.55 5.31 1.09 11.21
ell knee TT 500 150 150 230
1/f exponent TT -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -3.8
white noise level EE (uK-arcmin) 10.87 3.52 0.72 5.21
ell knee EE 200 60 60 65
1/f exponent EE -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -3.1
white noise level BB (uK-arcmin) 10.23 3.32 0.68 5.08
ell knee BB 200 60 60 60
1/f exponent BB -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -3.0
ell min 30 30 30 30
nside 512 512 512 512

Configuration 31

This configuration relies on monochromatic detectors labeled option 3 in the spreadsheet at 30 and 270 GHz and dichroic detectors at 95/155 GHz referred to as option 5. It consists of 2 optics tubes with 30 GHz detectors, 8 optics tubes with 95/155 GHz detectors, and 2 optics tubes with 270 GHz detectors.


Frequency (GHz) 20 30 95 155 270
Beam FWHM (arcmin) 11.0 72.8 22.7 22.7 8.0
white noise level TT (uK-arcmin) 16.55 5.31 1.26 2.94 11.21
ell knee TT 500 150 150 230 230
1/f exponent TT -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -3.8 -3.8
white noise level EE (uK-arcmin) 10.87 3.52 0.83 1.36 5.21
ell knee EE 200 60 60 65 65
1/f exponent EE -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -3.1 -3.1
white noise level BB (uK-arcmin) 10.23 3.32 0.79 1.34 5.08
ell knee BB 200 60 60 60 60
1/f exponent BB -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -3.0 -3.0
ell min 30 30 30 30 30
nside 512 512 512 512 512


Configuration 32

This configuration relies on dichroic detectors labeled option 5 in the spreadsheet. It consists of 1 optics tube with 30/40 GHz detectors, 8 optics tubes with 95/155 GHz detectors, and 3 optics tubes with 220/270 GHz detectors. There is no reason not to increase the bandwidth slightly and make them 90/150 GHz detectors, but discussion about NET levels to use for these is still ongoing. With current numbers this would lead to a ~10% decrease in noise levels for 90/150 GHz


Frequency (GHz) 20 30 40 95 155 220 270
Beam FWHM (arcmin) 11.0 72.8 72.8 22.7 22.7 13.0 13.0
white noise level TT (uK-arcmin) 16.55 9.36 11.85 1.26 2.94 10.15 17.40
ell knee TT 500 150 150 150 230 230 230
1/f exponent TT -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -3.8 -3.8 -3.8
white noise level EE (uK-arcmin) 10.87 6.20 7.85 0.83 1.36 4.71 8.08
ell knee EE 200 60 60 60 65 65 65
1/f exponent EE -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -3.1 -3.1 -3.1
white noise level BB (uK-arcmin) 10.23 5.85 7.40 0.79 1.34 4.60 7.89
ell knee BB 200 60 60 60 60 60 60
1/f exponent BB -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0
ell min 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
nside 512 512 512 512 512 512 512


Configuration 33

This configuration is "S4 Pole — 7 years with 12 tubes of Config 5" described in the posting Survey_Performance_Expectations. It relies on dichroic detectors labeled option 5 in the spreadsheet. It consists of 1 optics tube with 30/40 GHz detectors, 4 optics tubes with 85/145 GHz detectors, 4 optics tubes with 95/155 GHz detectors, and 3 optics tubes with 220/270 GHz detectors.


Frequency (GHz) 20 30 40 85 95 145 155 220 270
Bandwidth (GHz) 5.0 9.0 12.0 20.4 22.8 31.9 34.1 48.4 59.4
Beam FWHM (arcmin) 11.0 72.8 72.8 25.5 22.7 25.5 22.7 13.0 13.0
white noise level TT (uK-arcmin) 16.55 9.36 11.85 2.02 1.78 3.89 4.16 10.15 17.40
ell knee TT 500 150 150 150 150 230 230 230 230
1/f exponent TT -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -4.4 -3.8 -3.8 -3.8 -3.8
white noise level EE (uK-arcmin) 10.87 6.20 7.85 1.34 1.18 1.80 1.93 4.71 8.08
ell knee EE 200 60 60 60 60 65 65 65 65
1/f exponent EE -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -3.1 -3.1 -3.1 -3.1
white noise level BB (uK-arcmin) 10.23 5.85 7.40 1.27 1.12 1.76 1.89 4.60 7.89
ell knee BB 200 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
1/f exponent BB -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -1.7 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0
ell min 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
nside 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 512

Noise characterization

To characterize the noise properties of the simulations, we provide a plot for each configuration comparing the noise spectra obtained from the simulations with the expectation based on the input noise model. In addition to the expected average, we can also predict the noise variance. The comparison of the predicted noise variance with the noise variance obtained from the simulations is also shown for each configuration. In addition, we show sample realizations of the noise maps for the different frequency bands

Configuration 30

Comparison of simulation average with noise model

L2Nl 30.png

Comparison of noise variance with expectation based on noise model and weight map

L2sigmaNl 30.png


Configuration 31

Comparison of simulation average with noise model

L2Nl 31.png

Comparison of noise variance with expectation based on noise model and weight map

L2sigmaNl 31.png


Configuration 32

Comparison of simulation average with noise model

L2Nl 32.png

Comparison of noise variance with expectation based on noise model and weight map

L2sigmaNl 32.png


Configuration 33

Comparison of simulation average with noise model

L2Nl 33.png

Comparison of noise variance with expectation based on noise model and weight map

L2sigmaNl 33.png


Sample noise realizations

Configuration 30

Noise realization 0001

30.0001.png

Noise realization 0002

30.0002.png

Configuration 31

Noise realization 0001

31.0001.png

Noise realization 0002

31.0002.png

Configuration 32

Noise realization 0001

32.0001.png

Noise realization 0002

32.0002.png

Configuration 33

Noise realization 0001

33.0001.png

Noise realization 0002

33.0002.png