Difference between revisions of "SZastro"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
'''LRGs'''
 
'''LRGs'''
  
[[image SN_LRG.png  width="500px"]]
+
[[File:SN_LRG.png  width="500px"]]
[[image Pars_LRG.png  width="500px"]]
+
[[File:Pars_LRG.png  width="500px"]]
  
 
Epsilon is the feedback efficiency, and alpha is the normalization of the non-thermal pressure support. Also, Blue = 4m, Green = 5m, Red = 6m.
 
Epsilon is the feedback efficiency, and alpha is the normalization of the non-thermal pressure support. Also, Blue = 4m, Green = 5m, Red = 6m.
Line 14: Line 14:
 
'''QSOs'''
 
'''QSOs'''
  
[[image SN_QSO.png  width="500px"]]
+
[[File:SN_QSO.png  width="500px"]]
[[image Pars_QSO.png  width="500px"]]
+
[[File:Pars_QSO.png  width="500px"]]
  
 
To Do:
 
To Do:
Looking into well motivated science requirements for the S4-CDT, which will also guide our SO design. One idea is to couple these constraints to the baryonic effects on p(k), this is k dependent but we should be able to decide on a k range and accuracy to which we need to constrain feedback etc. Any other ideas would be very helpful.
+
Looking into well motivated science requirements for the S4-CDT[[File:Example.jpg]]. One idea is to couple these constraints to the baryonic effects on p(k), this is k dependent but we should be able to decide on a k range and accuracy to which we need to constrain feedback etc. Any other ideas would be very helpful.

Revision as of 10:24, 8 March 2017

Background discussion

(Nick writing of behalf of Simone, Emmanuel, and David)

We forecasted S/N and constraints on feedback and non-thermal pressure support for samples of LRGs and QSOs using combined tSZ and kSZ observations and a DESI-like spectroscopic. Here we use the the numbers density of objects quoted in | Table 3 of the DESI white paper.

LRGs

File:SN LRG.png width="500px" File:Pars LRG.png width="500px"

Epsilon is the feedback efficiency, and alpha is the normalization of the non-thermal pressure support. Also, Blue = 4m, Green = 5m, Red = 6m.

QSOs

File:SN QSO.png width="500px" File:Pars QSO.png width="500px"

To Do: Looking into well motivated science requirements for the S4-CDTExample.jpg. One idea is to couple these constraints to the baryonic effects on p(k), this is k dependent but we should be able to decide on a k range and accuracy to which we need to constrain feedback etc. Any other ideas would be very helpful.