Difference between revisions of "SZastro"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
(''Nick writing of behalf of Simone, Emmanuel, and David'') | (''Nick writing of behalf of Simone, Emmanuel, and David'') | ||
| − | We forecasted S/N and constraints on feedback and non-thermal pressure support for samples of LRGs and QSOs using combined tSZ and kSZ observations and a DESI-like spectroscopic. Here we use the the numbers density of objects quoted in [https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0847 | Table 3] of the DESI white paper. | + | We forecasted S/N and constraints on feedback and non-thermal pressure support for samples of LRGs and QSOs using combined tSZ and kSZ observations and a DESI-like spectroscopic survey. Here we use the the numbers density of objects quoted in [https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0847 | Table 3] of the DESI white paper. |
| − | '''LRGs''' | + | '''LRGs''' (2e13 Msol) |
[[File:SN_LRG.png|500px]] | [[File:SN_LRG.png|500px]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The orange box illustrates a 3% constraint on these parameters. | The orange box illustrates a 3% constraint on these parameters. | ||
| − | '''QSOs''' | + | '''QSOs''' (4e12 Msol) |
[[File:SN_QSO.png|500px]] | [[File:SN_QSO.png|500px]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:02, 8 March 2017
(Nick writing of behalf of Simone, Emmanuel, and David)
We forecasted S/N and constraints on feedback and non-thermal pressure support for samples of LRGs and QSOs using combined tSZ and kSZ observations and a DESI-like spectroscopic survey. Here we use the the numbers density of objects quoted in | Table 3 of the DESI white paper.
LRGs (2e13 Msol)
Epsilon is the feedback efficiency, and alpha is the normalization of the non-thermal pressure support. Also, Blue = 4m, Green = 5m, Red = 6m. The orange box illustrates a 3% constraint on these parameters.
QSOs (4e12 Msol)
The orange box illustrates a 25% constraint on these parameters.
To Do: Looking into well motivated science requirements for the S4-CDT. One idea is to couple these constraints to the baryonic effects on p(k), this is k dependent but we should be able to decide on a k range and accuracy to which we need to constrain feedback etc. Any other ideas would be very helpful.
