Difference between revisions of "SAT Scanning Strategies I"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
The Chile deepest and the Pole widest maps have the same maximum depth. | The Chile deepest and the Pole widest maps have the same maximum depth. | ||
| − | We show here the binned depth maps. First for Chile: | + | We show here the binned depth maps and depth maps truncated at nhit > nhitmax / 2. First for Chile: |
| − | [[File:total_wcov.segmented.chile.png| | + | [[File:total_wcov.segmented.chile.png|400px]] |
| + | [[File:total_wcov.cut.chile.png|400px]] | ||
and then for the Pole: | and then for the Pole: | ||
| − | [[File:total_wcov.segmented.pole.png| | + | [[File:total_wcov.segmented.pole.png|400px]] |
| + | [[File:total_wcov.cut.pole.png|400px]] | ||
to show the difference in sky area. Each color corresponds to a 1µK range in depth. | to show the difference in sky area. Each color corresponds to a 1µK range in depth. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 28 March 2019
March 2019
Background
In this post we collect results from separate SAT scanning studies for Chile (Deeper SAT from Chile and Deeper SAT from Chile II) and the South Pole (Deep SAT from the Pole, Wider SAT from the Pole and Wider SAT from the Pole II).
Comparison
Here is a table of the scanning strategies and the resulting depth maps:
| Name | el_min [deg] | el_max [deg] | fsky (raw) | fsky (noise) | fsky (signal) | max. depth [µK/arcmin] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chile deep | 45 | 60 | 0.516 | 0.182 | 0.059 | 3.25 |
| Chile deepest | 35 | 60 | 0.501 | 0.158 | 0.047 | 3.00 |
| Pole widest | 40 | 60 | 0.138 | 0.073 | 0.047 | 3.01 |
| Pole wide | 45 | 60 | 0.120 | 0.065 | 0.043 | 2.81 |
| Pole deep | 50 | 55 | 0.050 | 0.029 | 0.019 | 1.78 |
The Chile deepest and the Pole widest maps have the same maximum depth. We show here the binned depth maps and depth maps truncated at nhit > nhitmax / 2. First for Chile:
and then for the Pole:
to show the difference in sky area. Each color corresponds to a 1µK range in depth.
