Difference between revisions of "More on high cadence LAT"
(Created page with "''December 11, 2020 - Julian Borrill, Reijo Keskitalo and Sara Simon'' =Introduction= This post continues the development of the high cadence scanning strategy. Earlier po...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ''December 11, 2020 - Julian Borrill | + | ''December 11, 2020 - Reijo Keskitalo, Julian Borrill and Sara Simon'' |
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [[High_cadence_LAT_from_Chile]] | * [[High_cadence_LAT_from_Chile]] | ||
− | Here, we explore the area of the sky that is continuously observed within some time window. | + | Here, we explore the area of the sky that is continuously observed within some time window, driven by the requirements of the transient science goals. In particular we need to be able to follow the evolution of GRB light curves in order to be confident that we can reject false positives, which entails observing the same sky on several consecutive days. |
=Specifications= | =Specifications= |
Revision as of 15:53, 11 December 2020
December 11, 2020 - Reijo Keskitalo, Julian Borrill and Sara Simon
Introduction
This post continues the development of the high cadence scanning strategy. Earlier posts on the topic:
Here, we explore the area of the sky that is continuously observed within some time window, driven by the requirements of the transient science goals. In particular we need to be able to follow the evolution of GRB light curves in order to be confident that we can reject false positives, which entails observing the same sky on several consecutive days.
Specifications
We use the azimuth-modulated high cadence strategy with the following parameters:
- 140 degree throw
- 30 degree avoidance radius around the Sun and the Moon
- 40 degree observing elevation
- observe with the full CHLAT : FOV = 8.4 degrees
Results
Top of the plot shows daily hit maps for first four weeks of January. We took all 365 hit maps and evaluated the common sky area in various windows. The sky fraction is plotted in the bottom of the plot.
We find that the common sky area depends strongly on the width of the window and day of the year. The dips in the common sky area occur when the Sun and the Moon obstruct disjoint sets of pixels. Wider windows allow for more Lunar motion leading to reduced common sky area.
Here we collect some numerical information in table form:
Window [days] | Minimum fsky | Min. fsky (best 90%) | Median fsky |
1 | 0.380 | 0.423 | 0.468 |
2 | 0.327 | 0.389 | 0.439 |
5 | 0.244 | 0.303 | 0.360 |
7 | 0.200 | 0.254 | 0.315 |
10 | 0.117 | 0.193 | 0.257 |
14 | 0.003 | 0.095 | 0.199 |