Difference between revisions of "LBNL-2016: Time-Ordered Data Processing"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 32: | Line 32: | ||
* What about atmosphere? | * What about atmosphere? | ||
** Moving slab prototypes exist. | ** Moving slab prototypes exist. | ||
+ | * Loudly stated that TOD sims will not be used in the 3-month timescale forecasting. | ||
+ | ** OK, but is there something we can do on the next timescale (~6 months) | ||
+ | ** At least agree on common inputs & data formats. | ||
+ | *** That's coming up soon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Time to Pixel Domain''' | ||
+ | * Are preprocessing steps included in instrument | ||
+ | |||
+ | --------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Word of the day:'' '''Exciting''' | ||
--------- | --------- |
Revision as of 13:40, 9 March 2016
Time-Ordered Data Processing Birds-of-a-Feather Session: Wednesday, March 9, 9 AM
Attending: Julian Borrill, Tom Crawford, Ted Kisner, Kris Gorski, Graca Rocha, Clem Pryke, Nick Harrington, Jesse Treu, Kyle Story, Nathan Whitehorn, Olivier Perdereau, Reijo Keskitalo
Notes
Discussion of TOD scanning simulations
- Scanning with full 4-pi beam: do we really get the 4-pi beam at high fidelity?
- at some level, not the data folks' problem.
- Are we really going to simulate full TODs, including data that we will eventually cut in the real TOD?
- yes, at least to test automated data cuts.
- who is going to take on the task of creating this model?
- we pretty much know how to do it now, unless the fundamental detector and/or readout architecture changes.
- Do we need to simulate TES & electronics response?
- Not a high priority. Assume detectors/electronics with funky response will not pass CD.
- RFI pickup?
- Impossible to implement in sims without model of pickup.
- Time-dependent focal plane / optics distortion?
- Real-world examples to go on from ACT & PB
- We need scan strategy to be defined to do sims.
- Is anyone considering using anything but azimuth scans as fast and wide as you can go?
Digression into computing plan
- Are we really going to use grid computing (rather than parallel processing on large clusters)?
- Certainly not for anything for which we have to send around real TOD. (I.e., just for sims.)
- What about data management / delivery from sites?
- Pole bandwidth barely accommodates SPT-3G and will be unlikely to increase enough to handle S4. Similar issues exist in Atacama.
Return to TOD sims
- Will there be half-wave plates on S4?
- Can't rule it out. How do you make a model of non-ideality for a HWP?
- Are we aiming to have a perfect set of TOD sims by summer or 10 years from now?
- There will be a profile of what we can simulate. Could in theory have some level of TOD sims by summer.
- What about atmosphere?
- Moving slab prototypes exist.
- Loudly stated that TOD sims will not be used in the 3-month timescale forecasting.
- OK, but is there something we can do on the next timescale (~6 months)
- At least agree on common inputs & data formats.
- That's coming up soon.
Time to Pixel Domain
- Are preprocessing steps included in instrument
Word of the day: Exciting
Gotcha scorecard
TIme | Deliverer | Receiver |
9:59 | Ted | Nathan |