Difference between revisions of "LBNL-2016: Time-Ordered Data Processing"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "== Time-Ordered Data Processing Birds-of-a-Feather Session: Wednesday, March 9, 9 AM == '''Notes''' * Discussion of TOD scanning simulations with full 4-pi beam ** do we real...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Time-Ordered Data Processing Birds-of-a-Feather Session: Wednesday, March 9, 9 AM == | == Time-Ordered Data Processing Birds-of-a-Feather Session: Wednesday, March 9, 9 AM == | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Attending''': Julian Borrill, Tom Crawford, Ted Kisner, Kris Gorski, Graca Rocha, Clem Pryke, Nick Harrington, Jesse, Kyle Story, Nathan Whitehorn, Olivier Perdereau | ||
'''Notes''' | '''Notes''' | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
* Discussion of TOD scanning simulations with full 4-pi beam | * Discussion of TOD scanning simulations with full 4-pi beam | ||
** do we really get the 4-pi beam at high fidelity? | ** do we really get the 4-pi beam at high fidelity? | ||
| − | ** at some level, not the data folks' problem | + | ** at some level, not the data folks' problem. |
| + | * Are we really going to simulate full TODs, including data that we will eventually cut in the real TOD? | ||
| + | ** yes, at least to test automated data cuts. | ||
| + | ** who is going to take on the task of creating this model? | ||
| + | ** we pretty much know how to do it now, unless the fundamental detector and/or readout architecture changes. | ||
Revision as of 12:35, 9 March 2016
Time-Ordered Data Processing Birds-of-a-Feather Session: Wednesday, March 9, 9 AM
Attending: Julian Borrill, Tom Crawford, Ted Kisner, Kris Gorski, Graca Rocha, Clem Pryke, Nick Harrington, Jesse, Kyle Story, Nathan Whitehorn, Olivier Perdereau
Notes
- Discussion of TOD scanning simulations with full 4-pi beam
- do we really get the 4-pi beam at high fidelity?
- at some level, not the data folks' problem.
- Are we really going to simulate full TODs, including data that we will eventually cut in the real TOD?
- yes, at least to test automated data cuts.
- who is going to take on the task of creating this model?
- we pretty much know how to do it now, unless the fundamental detector and/or readout architecture changes.
