Difference between revisions of "Joint Plenary for Forecasting/Reference Design"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*** Write down specs for eg. bandwidth, NET, etc, justified by demonstrated performance | *** Write down specs for eg. bandwidth, NET, etc, justified by demonstrated performance | ||
*** Need single reference document for all of these (wiki page?) | *** Need single reference document for all of these (wiki page?) | ||
| + | *** Cascade diagram progressively decomposing each element | ||
| + | *** For many boxes there are uncontroversial numbers that can be used as the starting point | ||
| + | *** On which parameters do we need to do better than S3 to achieve our goals? | ||
Revision as of 09:21, 7 March 2018
Notes
Questions:
- What plans for instrument systematics modeling on the decadal timescale and beyond? What instrument parameters values should we use, guided by simulations & experience?
- Complementary performance-based and ab initio forecasting
- Write down specs for eg. bandwidth, NET, etc, justified by demonstrated performance
- Need single reference document for all of these (wiki page?)
- Cascade diagram progressively decomposing each element
- For many boxes there are uncontroversial numbers that can be used as the starting point
- On which parameters do we need to do better than S3 to achieve our goals?
- Complementary performance-based and ab initio forecasting
