Difference between revisions of "Instrument Paper Comment"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
=== Telescope design ===
 
=== Telescope design ===
# Table 2-1: BICEP array, BICEP3, SPIDER info need to be added (Lorenzo)
+
# Table 2-1: BICEP array, BICEP3, SPIDER info need to be added (Lorenzo: by 6/1/2017 morning)
  
 
=== Receiver optics ===
 
=== Receiver optics ===
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
=== Focal plane optical coupling ===
 
=== Focal plane optical coupling ===
# capture CLASS technology (waiting for input from Karwan)
+
# capture CLASS technology (waiting for input from Karwan: by 6/1/2017 noon)
  
 
=== Focal plane sensor and readout ===
 
=== Focal plane sensor and readout ===
 
# comment
 
# comment

Latest revision as of 09:32, 1 June 2017

Please add comments in appropriate section: You can also send comments to Aritoki Suzuki at asuzuki@berkeley.edu

LATEX style

  1. Bunch of \newcommand (and similar) defined after \begin{document} in the cmbs4_instbook.tex, although it doesn't seem to cause any failures, it feels like many of those commands should live in the preamble. See for example the ADS abbreviations. It would be useful to clean up this file to improve readability. I think it generally makes it easier for people to contribute to the document.

General comment

  1. comments

Acronym Table: Bibliography

  1. comments

Introduction and Conclusion

  1. comments

Telescope design

  1. Table 2-1: BICEP array, BICEP3, SPIDER info need to be added (Lorenzo: by 6/1/2017 morning)

Receiver optics

  1. Improved Sections 3.5 and 3.7 intro? (Jeff)

Focal plane optical coupling

  1. capture CLASS technology (waiting for input from Karwan: by 6/1/2017 noon)

Focal plane sensor and readout

  1. comment