Difference between revisions of "Instrument Paper Comment"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
=== Focal plane optical coupling ===
 
=== Focal plane optical coupling ===
#  The use of the oxford comma is inconsistent
 
 
# capture CLASS technology correctly (waiting for input from Karwan)
 
# capture CLASS technology correctly (waiting for input from Karwan)
  
 
=== Focal plane sensor and readout ===
 
=== Focal plane sensor and readout ===
 
# comment
 
# comment

Revision as of 02:50, 1 June 2017

Please add comments in appropriate section: You can also send comments to Aritoki Suzuki at asuzuki@berkeley.edu

LATEX style

  1. Bunch of \newcommand (and similar) defined after \begin{document} in the cmbs4_instbook.tex, although it doesn't seem to cause any failures, it feels like many of those commands should live in the preamble. See for example the ADS abbreviations. It would be useful to clean up this file to improve readability. I think it generally makes it easier for people to contribute to the document.

General comment

  1. comments

Acronym Table: Bibliography

  1. comments

Introduction and Conclusion

  1. comments

Telescope design

  1. Table 2-1: BICEP array, BICEP3, SPIDER info need to be added (Lorenzo)

Receiver optics

  1. The beginning of section 3.6 has a long, useful introduction. Sections 3.5 and 3.7 are much more terse. I kinda liked the 3.6 intro...

Focal plane optical coupling

  1. capture CLASS technology correctly (waiting for input from Karwan)

Focal plane sensor and readout

  1. comment