Difference between revisions of "ForecastingStep1"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 61: | Line 61: | ||
|0.0222± 0.00003 | |0.0222± 0.00003 | ||
|0.1197±0.00062 | |0.1197±0.00062 | ||
− | |1. | + | |1.0459±0.00009 |
|2.20±0.021 | |2.20±0.021 | ||
− | |0.9655±0. | + | |0.9655±0.0020 |
− | |0.06±0. | + | |0.06±0.0058 |
|- | |- | ||
|Add your name here | |Add your name here |
Revision as of 10:00, 22 April 2016
Checking forecasting outputs
This should be run for the test case for S4+Planck. This is T/E/B/kappa. No clusters or BAO at this point (can be posted in other entries though). Settings described here and here:
- S4 = single channel (e.g. 150 GHz) at 1 uK/amin in T and 1.4uK/amin in P, 3 arcmin resolution.
- White noise, no FG inflation
- S4 T/E/B/k over 40% of sky, 30<ell < lmax
- Planck TT/TE/EE from 30<l<2500 over additional 20% of sky. Can use these 'Planck-pol' specs for noise:File:Planck pol.pdf
- Planck TT at l<30 over 80% of sky
- Tau prior 0.06+-0.01
- lmax(TT)=3000 unless explicit foreground cleaning is done in code for kSZ etc
- lmax(TE,EE)=5000 unless explicit foreground cleaning done in code
- kk reconstructed from 30<l<lmax using MV estimate
- quadratic estimator for lensing, ideally with iterative delensing
- Gaussian likelihood neglecting T/E/k covariance is ok, but non-Gaussian better
- non-linear power spectrum for kk, e.g. ok to use halofit in CAMB
- if easy to do, use pivot k=0.05
- don't need to use same fiducial, but useful to note what you have used.
obh2 | och2 | theta | 10^9 As | ns | tau | |
Stephen/Josquin | ||||||
Alex/Joel/Dan | ||||||
Mat/Neelima/Nam | ||||||
Jo/Erminia/Danielle | 0.0222± 0.00003 | 0.1197±0.00062 | 1.0459±0.00009 | 2.20±0.021 | 0.9655±0.0020 | 0.06±0.0058 |
Add your name here |
obh2 | och2 | theta | 10^9 As | ns | tau | mnu (meV) | |
Stephen/Josquin | |||||||
Alex/Joel/Dan | |||||||
Mat/Neelima/Nam | |||||||
Jo/Erminia/Danielle | 0.0222± 0.00003 | 0.1197±0.00077 | 1.046±0.00011 | 2.20±0.036 | 0.9655±0.0022 | 0.06±0.0084 | 60±68 |
Add your name here |
Notes
- From Jo: got these errors for Planck-alone for LCDM: 0.00017, 0.0014, 0.00047, 0.039, 0.004, 0.01.