Difference between revisions of "Estimates of delensing efficiency"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "'''Delensing with a dedicated telescope at the pole - A<sub>L</sub>=0.13''' This was the assumption made for the CDT report. At the time of writing no new reference configura...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Here I will rely on the recent configuration denoted 'Survey Performance Expectation 01' in the posting [[Survey Performance Expectations]].
 
Here I will rely on the recent configuration denoted 'Survey Performance Expectation 01' in the posting [[Survey Performance Expectations]].
The post does not contain all required information (e.g. l<sub>knee</sub> and the exponent for the 1/f contribution). From the note, I assume that for polarization l<sub>knee</sub>=800 and an exponent of -1.5. This leads to the following noise curves
+
The post does not contain all required information (e.g. l<sub>knee</sub> and the exponent for the 1/f contribution). Based on the corresponding pdf, I assume that for polarization l<sub>knee</sub>=800 and an exponent of -1.5. This leads to the following noise curves
  
 
'''Delensing with the large area telescopes from Chile and a dedicated LAT for delensing'''
 
'''Delensing with the large area telescopes from Chile and a dedicated LAT for delensing'''
  
 
Here I will assume an additional telescope dedicated to delensing with the same characteristics as the LATs described in 'Survey Performance Expectation 01' and observing the Chile mask shown in the posting [[Sky masks for simulations II]]
 
Here I will assume an additional telescope dedicated to delensing with the same characteristics as the LATs described in 'Survey Performance Expectation 01' and observing the Chile mask shown in the posting [[Sky masks for simulations II]]

Revision as of 01:18, 15 October 2018

Delensing with a dedicated telescope at the pole - AL=0.13

This was the assumption made for the CDT report. At the time of writing no new reference configuration is available. The forecast for the delensing efficiency for the CDT configuration was AL=0.13.

Delensing with the large area telescopes from Chile

Here I will rely on the recent configuration denoted 'Survey Performance Expectation 01' in the posting Survey Performance Expectations. The post does not contain all required information (e.g. lknee and the exponent for the 1/f contribution). Based on the corresponding pdf, I assume that for polarization lknee=800 and an exponent of -1.5. This leads to the following noise curves

Delensing with the large area telescopes from Chile and a dedicated LAT for delensing

Here I will assume an additional telescope dedicated to delensing with the same characteristics as the LATs described in 'Survey Performance Expectation 01' and observing the Chile mask shown in the posting Sky masks for simulations II