Difference between revisions of "Argonne-2018:P3-2"
From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchYujiChinone (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
# Forecasts for Atacama and South Pole ('''15 min''') | # Forecasts for Atacama and South Pole ('''15 min''') | ||
#* Achieved performance for ABS [Akito Kusaka] | #* Achieved performance for ABS [Akito Kusaka] | ||
| − | #* Low ell noise | + | #* Low ell noise ([[File:Achieved_one-over-f_noise_2018-03-06_chinoney.pptx.pdf]]) [Yuji Chinone] |
# Systematics studies and coordination with technology development working groups [Colin Bischoff] ('''10 min''') | # Systematics studies and coordination with technology development working groups [Colin Bischoff] ('''10 min''') | ||
# Forecasting and simulation plan for Decadal input document ('''30 min''') | # Forecasting and simulation plan for Decadal input document ('''30 min''') | ||
Revision as of 09:55, 6 March 2018
Back to Argonne 2018 main page
Parallel session P3-2: Forecasting - Instrumentation / systematics for the Decadal input document (chair: C. Bischoff)
- Summary of forecasting to date (25 min)
- Performance-based forecasting [Victor Buza]
- Forecasting for Simons Observatory [Jeff McMahon]
- Forecasts for Atacama and South Pole (15 min)
- Achieved performance for ABS [Akito Kusaka]
- Low ell noise (File:Achieved one-over-f noise 2018-03-06 chinoney.pptx.pdf) [Yuji Chinone]
- Systematics studies and coordination with technology development working groups [Colin Bischoff] (10 min)
- Forecasting and simulation plan for Decadal input document (30 min)
- Spectral vs map vs time domain forecasting and simulation [Julian Borrill]
- Updates to performance-based forecasting: large vs small aperture, Atacama vs South Pole
- Priorities for systematics forecasting
- Coordination between forecasting for r, light relics, and extended science
